Bill
I suppose you noticed that the main thrust of this petition seems to be for recognition and inclusion of the completely unrelated communities to the operations at Wafi/Gopu/HiddenValley within the MOA.
This highlights the complete contradiction and fallacy of the absurd proposal by Namah recently for the devolution of state interests in minerals to land owners.
Most of this petition is concerned clearly with an attempt to gain a commercial advantage without regard to rectification of a possible problem in the riverine system.
Clearly the cause of the problem is yet unidentified.
No doubt this will become yet another one of those endless claims.
On your comment, I note that the costs in the cause in relation to the Ramu matter are yet to be paid, least ways that’s how it seems.
Difficult to find any credible response from a community that thinks that a mining company is an endless source of money.
Would they the milk the cow without feeding it?
And when there is no more milk would they kill it and eat it?
Hold on not to take the concerns of the people seriously.
Sooner or later you will wake up or more likely get waken up.
Your comments are fairly ignorant and arrogant as your livelihood depends not directly on the natural enviromental resources like the Labu people.
Juergen
You comments are noted.
Now, as I was saying……………..
I suppose you noticed that the main thrust of this petition seems to be for recognition and inclusion of the completely unrelated communities to the operations at Wafi/Gopu/HiddenValley within the MOA.
This highlights the complete contradiction and fallacy of the absurd proposal by Namah recently for the devolution of state interests in minerals to land owners.
Most of this petition is concerned clearly with an attempt to gain a commercial advantage without regard to rectification of a possible problem in the riverine system.
Clearly the cause of the problem is yet unidentified.
No doubt this will become yet another one of those endless claims.
On your comment, I note that the costs in the cause in relation to the Ramu matter are yet to be paid, least ways that’s how it seems.
Difficult to find any credible response from a community that thinks that a mining company is an endless source of money.
Would they the milk the cow without feeding it?
And when there is no more milk would they kill it and eat it?
Just out of curiosity – what happens if the mine is found to not be at fault for the fish kill? Can they ask for compensation from these people?
Bill
I suppose you noticed that the main thrust of this petition seems to be for recognition and inclusion of the completely unrelated communities to the operations at Wafi/Gopu/HiddenValley within the MOA.
This highlights the complete contradiction and fallacy of the absurd proposal by Namah recently for the devolution of state interests in minerals to land owners.
Most of this petition is concerned clearly with an attempt to gain a commercial advantage without regard to rectification of a possible problem in the riverine system.
Clearly the cause of the problem is yet unidentified.
No doubt this will become yet another one of those endless claims.
On your comment, I note that the costs in the cause in relation to the Ramu matter are yet to be paid, least ways that’s how it seems.
Difficult to find any credible response from a community that thinks that a mining company is an endless source of money.
Would they the milk the cow without feeding it?
And when there is no more milk would they kill it and eat it?
Hold on not to take the concerns of the people seriously.
Sooner or later you will wake up or more likely get waken up.
Your comments are fairly ignorant and arrogant as your livelihood depends not directly on the natural enviromental resources like the Labu people.
Juergen
You comments are noted.
Now, as I was saying……………..
I suppose you noticed that the main thrust of this petition seems to be for recognition and inclusion of the completely unrelated communities to the operations at Wafi/Gopu/HiddenValley within the MOA.
This highlights the complete contradiction and fallacy of the absurd proposal by Namah recently for the devolution of state interests in minerals to land owners.
Most of this petition is concerned clearly with an attempt to gain a commercial advantage without regard to rectification of a possible problem in the riverine system.
Clearly the cause of the problem is yet unidentified.
No doubt this will become yet another one of those endless claims.
On your comment, I note that the costs in the cause in relation to the Ramu matter are yet to be paid, least ways that’s how it seems.
Difficult to find any credible response from a community that thinks that a mining company is an endless source of money.
Would they the milk the cow without feeding it?
And when there is no more milk would they kill it and eat it?
You can’t just distroy people’s environment without any responsibility.