Tag Archives: Trans-Tasman Resources

Iwi rallies to anti-seabed mining cause

Laurel Stowell | Wanganui Chronicle

OUTSPOKEN: The Ngati Ruanui team has its say at Trans-Tasman Resources' marine application hearing.

OUTSPOKEN: The Ngati Ruanui team has its say at Trans-Tasman Resources’ marine application hearing.

South Taranaki tribe Ngati Ruanui has spent too long opposing seabed mining offshore from Patea to stop now.

It’s joining with Kiwis Against Seabed Mining (KASM) to support the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) decision to refuse Trans-Tasman Resources’ application to mine offshore in the South Taranaki Bight.

Te Runanga o Ngati Ruanui Trust chief executive officer Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said the iwi had applied to be part of the High Court case as Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) appeals that decision. Yesterday was the deadline for registering to take part.

She was hoping others would want to support the decision of the EPA committee – other iwi perhaps, or fisheries groups. Being part of the case could be expensive, and the parties might be able to get together and share different aspects of it, and the costs. She was unsure what would be covered in the High Court, but if it called on different opinions or advice Ngati Ruanui wanted to be there to give its view. It had lawyers ready, and had extensive experience on resource exploitation matters. It was also handling the ironsand issue within the Iwi Chairs’ Forum.

The iwi was bitterly disappointed that TTR had appealed the decision.

“At the EPA hearing we outlined cultural and environmental concerns and expressed concern at TTR’s poor consultation,” Mrs Ngarewa-Packer said.

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, New Zealand

KASM joins NZ seabed mining appeal fight

KASM will join the fight to oppose an appeal by Trans Tasman Resources to get consent for its seabed mining proposal.

NZCity News

Ocean campaigner KASM is trying to shaft an appeal by a mining company which plans to extract 50 million tonnes of black sand from the Taranaki sea bed.

Trans Tasman Resources is appealing the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision in June to reject its application to mine ironsands over the next 20 years.

Kiwis Against Seabed Mining has announced it will fight the appeal alongside the EPA in the High Court.

“We are extremely disappointed the company has lodged this appeal, and we are determined to fight this to the end,” said KASM chairman Phil McCabe.

Trans Tasman Resources spent $60 million over seven years developing a proposal to mine black sand which it said would increase GDP by $240 million annually.

But the EPA denied the application after two months of hearings, saying evidence to support it was uncertain and inadequate.

KASM celebrated the win, labelling it a victory for the 4800 iwi, fishers, surfers, divers and other locals who had made submissions against the proposal.

TTR said it was “extremely disappointed with the decision” and believed the project could be achieved in an environmentally sustainable way.

Within days the company lodged an appeal in the High Court in Wellington.

Both KASM and the Green Party have been critical of National’s decision to advocate for the proposal and grant TTR $25 million.

Mr McCabe said the proposal still appeared to have backing from the government, which has now issued permits to companies to mine black sand down the North Island’s west coast.

Many of the permits operate in the habitat of the critically endangered Maui’s Dolphin, one of the world’s most endangered dolphins.

“The government has backed the wrong horse here,” he said.

“It has implemented new legislation to support activities like seabed mining, pledged an up to $25 million taxpayer subsidy to the foreign-owned company, yet now their own EPA has decided that there were too many uncertainties to grant consent.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, New Zealand

Mining company appeals NZ EPA decision

Radio New Zealand

Trans Tasman Resources wants to mine iron sands off the coast of Taranaki. Photo: PHOTO NZ

Trans Tasman Resources wants to mine iron sands off the coast of Taranaki. Photo: PHOTO NZ

A mining company has filed an appeal in the Wellington High Court after being refused consent to mine ironsands off the coast of Taranaki.

Trans-Tasman Resources proposed to mine for iron ore in an area of seabed 22 kms off the coast of Patea, but was turned down by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) on 18 June.

The application to the EPA was to mine 50 million tonnes of seabed material from the South Taranaki Bight.

The authority’s decision-making committee says the rejection was based on uncertainty about the scope and significance of the potential environmental effects, and existing fishing and iwi interests.

A Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) spokesperson says the appeal against the authority’s decision to decline its marine consents for mining was filed on Tuesday – the deadline for an appeal.

The company’s initial proposal drew 4800 submissions, with 99 percent opposed.

Disappointed but not surprised

Opponents of the TTR bid are disappointed, but not surprised that the company has lodged an appeal against the decision.

Chair of Kiwis Against Seabed Mining (KASM) Phil McCabe says the appeal is upsetting and ignores the will of the majority of New Zealanders.

“They were given a decision, it was a comprehensive decision (by) the people of New Zealand – 99 percent of submissions opposed their application.

“They’re taking it a step further, they have a right to do that but we’ll see how it plays out,” Mr McCabe says.

A Trans-Tasman Resources spokesperson says as the appeal is now before the courts, no further comments will be made.

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, New Zealand

Seabed mining fight continues in NZ

Elton Smallman | Waikato Times


Celebratory drinks turned sour for ocean campaigners after Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) said it would appeal a decision against a massive iron-sands mining operations off the Taranaki Coast.

Kiwis Against Seabed Mining (KASM) threw a party two weeks ago for supporters of the successful campaign to see off the mining giant.

However, KASM chairman Phil McCabe woke yesterday to news worthy of a painful hangover.

“We were 60 or 70 per cent expecting it,” McCabe said.

“They are a hungry bunch and they’ll do anything they can to get what they want.”

KASM’s two-year battle with the New Zealand-based mining company had taken a toll on members, but McCabe said they would pick themselves up and start again.

“We all love the ocean and we don’t want to see the ocean degraded and that’s what gives us our energy. We’ll follow it through to the end.”

TTR applied for marine consent for an annual harvest of 50 million tonnes of iron-rich sediment over 20 years, 36 kilometres off the Patea Coast.

A floating processing plant would separate 5 million tonnes of iron ore concentrate for export and the remaining spoil, about 45 million tonnes, would be dumped back to the ocean bottom.

An Environment Protection Authority-appointed committee declined TTR’s application, citing inadequacies and uncertainty in TTR’s bid.

McCabe said a core group had put their lives on hold to fight TTR’s application and hundreds more helped. It had cost them money and time.

“I’ve put my business on the backburner for two years and put 40 or 50 per cent of my work life to address TTR’s proposal,” McCabe said.

“We haven’t invited this and yet it has cost us considerably.”

The decision-making committee’s finding had been comprehensive and the TTR application had not been up to speed, he said.

“The whole proposal is offensive and it’s taken a lot of time from people’s lives and caused a lot of undue stress and the company is keen on keeping that going.”

TTR’s board said it would appeal the EPA decision on its application to mine iron sands in the South Taranaki Bight.

The decision-making committee’s ruling could be appealed only on points of law, but TTR chief executive Tim Crossley did not disclose the reason behind TTR’s stance.

“We have now studied the decision in detail with the assistance of our advisers and experts, and are confident that there are strong grounds for a successful appeal,” he said.

TTR had already spent more than $60 million on exploration.

TTR’s objective was for substantial economic development of the region and to protect the environment, Crossley said.

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, New Zealand, Pacific region

Miners seek to take the plunge

James Wilson | Financial Times (UK)

Construction of the largest machine - the 310-tonne Bulk Cutter - was completed in the UK

Construction of the largest machine – the 310-tonne Bulk Cutter

Nautilus Minerals hopes a trio of machines being assembled in the northeast of England will foment a mining revolution on the other side of the world.

The front of one of the 6m-high machines in subsea equipment maker SMD’s works near Newcastle upon Tyne has a huge roller-like device, covered in points like a medieval cudgel. This 310-tonne, ivory-white monster is Nautilus’s “bulk cutter” and the mining company hopes to deploy it, and other SMD machines, in an extreme environment: 1,600m below the Pacific Ocean, where it will tear through the seabed to mine gold and copper ore before pumping it to the surface.

Seabed mining has long been talked about as having the potential to change the global supply of many minerals. Nautilus’s machinery orders, and its search for a ship that will be the floating processing station for the ore that it mines, are a sign of its confidence that its project can meet the intended 2017 start date.

Canadian-listed Nautilus is “all the closer to making seafloor mining a reality”, said Mike Johnston, chief executive, when the bulk cutter was completed this year. It comes after Nautilus resolved a dispute with the government of Papua New Guinea, which owns 15 per cent of the project and can acquire a further 15 per cent.

But for all the excitement around seabed mining, this subsector of the resources industry continues to advance in fits and starts. Several decades of growing knowledge of the way mineral deposits have accumulated on ocean floors have still not yielded sustained efforts at exploitation by the world’s most experienced mining companies, while adventurous smaller operators have struggled to overcome financial and environmental concerns.

Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR), a New Zealand company, had its application to mine iron ore sands off the country’s coast rejected on environmental grounds last week. And while Namibia is one of the few nations familiar with seabed mining – diamonds have been mined offshore for 50 years – the same country last year put a moratorium in place over proposed seabed phosphate mining.

In the mineral-rich subsea areas far from land, where the International Seabed Authority – a UN organisation – is responsible for the award of mining exploration licences, progress in seabed mining has been disappointing, says Nii Allotey Odunton, secretary-general.

Thirteen years after the ISA began issuing licences – and with the first ones awarded expiring in 2016 – Mr Odunton wants more progress.

Significant resources lie on the seabed. Closer to land, meanwhile, some alluvial sands yield sufficient mineral deposits – as is the case with Namibian diamonds.

De Beers, the diamond company owned by Anglo American, mines these waters using “crawlers” on the seabed. Anglo is also a shareholder in Nautilus. Rising prices for many metals, and the falling quality of mineral deposits on land, make seabed deposits relatively attractive. In some cases seabed minerals are practically renewable, since they are extruded from the earth’s interior directly into the ocean through hydrothermal vents.

In the case of Nautilus’s project, the miner says its resources have a copper grade of 7 per cent. In contrast, copper mines on land today often deal with grades below 1 per cent.

But environmental opposition is often strong. Critics say ecosystems would be affected by noise, light and sediment. Rejecting TTR’s application as “premature”, New Zealand’s Environmental Protection Authority said a sediment plume about 50km long and up to 20km wide could be created.

“The conditions proposed, while extensive, are not sufficient to give us the degree of confidence we needed to be able to grant consent,” the authority said. TTR had wanted to mine in water up to 45m deep about 30km off the coast using seabed crawlers similar to those deployed off Namibia.

A second New Zealand company, Chatham Rock Phosphate, wants authority approval for plans to mine phosphate in water 400m deep, 450km east of the country. “Our application cannot be compared with TTR’s. It is for a different mineral, in a very different marine environment using different extraction methods,” the company says.

Shontel Norgate, Nautilus’s chief financial officer, says seabed mining can be less intrusive than on land. “Not having to strip mountain tops or relocate communities – that becomes quite a compelling argument,” she says.

Even if environmental concerns can be overcome, much of the economics of seabed mining is guesswork because so little has been done before. That makes it almost impossible for seabed miners to talk about being able to access economically viable reserves, rather than simply mineral resources. That, in turn, makes debt financing for seabed mining hard to obtain. Nautilus’s plan is to rely on equity finance.

For such reasons, says the ISA’s Mr Odunton, it is important that deep sea mining starts to yield more tangible results so all participants can become more confident, rather than get bogged down in “years and years of marine research”.

Without more progress, drawing up a commonly accepted set of rules and accounting conventions to govern deep sea mining will be almost impossible, he says.

“We are trying to push many [of the concession holders] to undertake some pilot mining work,” he adds. “The biggest problem is nobody has ever done it before and everything becomes an assumption you are making . . . we know a heck of a lot more than we did before but I am trying to deal with the objective of mining profitably.”

Additional reporting by Chris Tighe

Fathoming out a resource-rich sea

Significant resources lie on the seabed, writes James Wilson. In deep seas, these are normally found in three environments:

Sea-floor massive sulphides Created by hydrothermal activity when very hot liquids are released on to the sea floor along mid-ocean ridges. They are most valuable for base metals such as copper as well as gold and silver.

Polymetallic nodules Lumps about the size of potatoes that contain minerals including manganese and iron. The most prospective zone is in the middle of the Pacific.

Cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts Layers form on undersea mountains, most strategic for being rich in cobalt but also containing other minerals. Many prospective sites are in the Pacific.

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Exploration, Human rights, Mine construction, New Zealand, Pacific region, Papua New Guinea

Miner appeals rejection of seabed project in NZ

Australian Associated Press | Mail Online

A mining company is appealing the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to reject its application to mine ironsands from the seabed off the Taranaki coast.

The EPA’s decision-making committee rejected Trans-Tasman Resources’ application on June 18, which was seen as a victory for conservation efforts but a blow to the government’s desire to help mineral extraction projects boost the economy.

Trans-Tasman’s board announced on Tuesday it will appeal the decision to decline marine consents for mining ironsands in the South Taranaki Bight.

“We have now studied the decision in detail with the assistance of our advisors and experts, and are confident that there are strong grounds for a successful appeal,” said the company’s chief executive Tim Crossley.

Mr Crossley said he would not comment further on its efforts to gain access to the South Taranaki Bight now that an appeal was being lodged.

TTR had 15 working days from the EPA’s rejection to lodge an appeal, and it’s expected that a court will deal with the matter within six months.

The miner said its objective is “to develop an ironsands extraction project which achieves substantial economic development while protecting the environment”.

The company has spent some $60 million over seven years developing the mineral extraction export proposal.

TTR said it believed it could pull it off in an environmentally sustainable way while creating additional exports of around $150m a year from the sale of around five million tonnes of titano-magnetite iron ore to Asian steelmills.

TTR had planned to use a suction dredging process some 36km off the coast of Patea that it said would have returned 90 per cent of the sands to the ocean floor.

Mining the seabed would have created hundreds of jobs and grown the Taranaki regional economy by $240m a year, TTR said.

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, New Zealand, Pacific region

We Won!


Phil McCabe | KASM Chairperson

We Won!

These two words have been spoken with bewildered elation by many over the last week. I still haven’t found the words that properly describe how I feel about the EPA’s decision to favour caution and deny the first application to mine New Zealand’s seabed.

Although many believed it impossible, the KASM committee and I never let go of the very real possibility of this win; from a big picture perspective, this win was a necessity. And it was that belief along with the awesome support from community that fueled this campaign.

Wow! I’m stoked, I’m proud and I’ve got to say, this is large … verging on huge!

We the people stood up to a foreign owned company and the New Zealand government who tried to quietly slip through an environmentally destructive and culturally offensive proposal – and we whipped them at their own game. Not only did they fail, they failed while playing under their own rules written to give them an unfair advantage.

For me, and lots of folk I’ve been talking to, this win has most definitely brought a sense of hope and belief. Hope inspired by all those that took action and belief that when we collectively act we affect change.

Like it or not, by definition, each and every person that took any action whatsoever that had even the slightest effect on this outcome, is an activist. You’re hooked now! Hah!

We know that we, together, have stopped the destruction of an area of ocean and important habitat for many species including Blue Whales and Maui’s Dolphin. That makes my heart sing!

As I sit here, nearly a week after the decision, what excites me even more is the potential of what might transpire from this lift in hope and belief as reverberations from this decision continue to be felt in the hearts and minds of people working on and those who care about similar issues.

This outcome was always going to set a precedent, not only for New Zealand communities and our marine environment, but globally also, for there is a growing number of communities around the planet facing such proposals in their waters.

This decision, resulting from our collective action, will inspire the protection of the world’s oceans for years to come and that is a beautiful thing!

On behalf of the KASM committee and core group, thank you, thank you for your every contribution and action large and small. For when we put them all side by side and stacked them up, we stood upon a wall that separated the greedy, destructive and dangerous from that which we love, the beautiful, wondrous and fragile. Our Oceans.

In highest gratitude.

Leave a comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, New Zealand, Pacific region