Barrick: Compo claims have no legal merit

The National aka The Loggers Times

BARRICK (Niugini) Ltd says claims against the company that it owed the Porgera landowners US$4 billion (K10.54bn) as compensation over a 23-year period are without “legal merit”.

Landowners protest at Porgera in October

Landowners protest at Porgera in October

Principal landowner Jonathan Paraia had said the landowners would gather evidence before the courts to claim overdue entitlements.

He said they want to hold the miner responsible for its negligence in environmental damage and breach of contract with the landowners and Enga provincial government.

“We (landowners) have brought in experts to assist us so that Enga will follow formal procedures to deal with the issue, 23 years of nothing, we want our people to deserve what is rightfully theirs,” Paraia said.

An overseas based independent specialist firm recently arrived in Enga to investigate environmental damage caused by the giant Porgera gold mine in the province.

The team was determined to unveil overdue benefits Barrick owed to the people of Porgera and Enga. Barrick said the PNG Government, through the State Solicitor, had already provided a formal written response to the claims.

A company spokesperson said:

“Barrick shares the State view that these claims are made without any legal basis.

“Barrick is always willing to discuss directly any issues of concern with stakeholders of the Porgera Joint Venture.

“We join with the State in encouraging the use of established formal channels to discuss any concerns or issues that stakeholders may have.”

Last month, Barrick announced the sale of its 95 per cent interest in the Porgera Joint Venture to potential investors.

An inside look at the Porgera mine and conditions for local people



Filed under Environmental impact, Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

2 responses to “Barrick: Compo claims have no legal merit

  1. Fred Hela

    I thought in life one cannot run and run and get away with murder. Reality has to catch up. Both State and Barrick have to face up to the fact they have neglected their responsibilities, in particular they have NOT kept their side of the bargain, especially when agreements were signed using unfair tactics, taking great advantage of ignorant uneducated landowners. ALL IN THE NAME OF PROFIT, GREEDY AS THEY ARE.

  2. Kaumonu

    Sounds familiar, Roughly the same figure demanded too! Look out PNG!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s