‘Catastrophic’ impact as Barrick sells assets

Jane Goldsmith | The Australian Mining Review

Porgera-gold-mine-tailings1-300x200BARRICK Gold has been hit by allegations of “irreparable” social, economic and environmental change as it flags intentions to offload a majority stake in the iconic Porgera mine, north-western Papua New Guinea (PNG).

Porgera landowners representative the Justice Foundation for Porgera (JFP) is seeking billions in compensation from Barrick Gold and its subsidiary Barrick Niugini, alleging that the venture breached agreements relating to environmental standards, the relocation of displaced landowners, and the number of fly in, fly out workers in the area.

In late February, Barrick and Barrick Niugini released a statement of intention to sell its PNG interests, which could offload any pending legal claims from landowners to potential buyers.

Mineral Resources Enga holds a 5 per cent share of Pogera in trust for the landowners with the Enga Provincial Government.

MRE chairman and director Kurubu Ipara said that Barrick intended to sell its interests without proper notice.

“[It will] exit PNG, leaving the landowners with a new owner who will not provide restitution for the damage left behind, or that MRE, the landowners or citizens of PNG will be left with an insurmountable bill to remedy the social and environmental damage,” he said.

The allegations against Barrick date back to 2011, after a Human Rights Watch report found Barrick Niugini mine guards had detained women found trespassing on the mine site and “gave them a choice of submitting to gang-rape or going to prison”, Mr Ipara said.

“Barrick has responded with dismissive hostility to concerns about its human rights record at Porgera,” the report stated.

MRE is a subsidiary of the government-owned Mineral Resources Development Company, which has battled allegations of corruption and mismanagement of its own.

Barrick’s move from PNG is a part of a greater debt reduction plan, which also includes the sale of assets in Australia.

1 Comment

Filed under Environmental impact, Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

One response to “‘Catastrophic’ impact as Barrick sells assets

  1. Linda Saul

    Hopefully, like Panguna, there will be no foreign “new owner”.
    With the legal aspect hanging, no other mining company would want to buy it and inherit the same problems surely?
    How about Barrick walking out and giving the whole working package away to PNG as compensation for damage to date?
    PNG has more than enough qualified mines personnel to operate the site. Many are employed overseas themselves in senior jobs but would prefer to work at home. Call them back to decent wages and only employ foreign consultants where needed.
    Small scale mining could also be allowed for landowners alongside main production. This model works for Oil Palm estates, why not mine sites?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s