Nautilus: ‘Solwara 1 seabed mine is an experiment’

pacific nuclear experiment

The Pacific has been used before for experiments – with terrible human and environmental costs

Nautilus Minerals has finally admitted it will use Solwara 1 as the test site for an expensive and potentially destructive experiment in which the potential victims are the rich marine environment of the Bismarck sea and the indigenous communities living along its coastline.

In its 2015 Annual Information Form [pdf 1.2MB], submitted to Canadian regulators in March and available on the company website, Nautilus says it does not know if its plans for seabed mining are financially or technically feasible or what the environmental and social impacts will be.

There are ‘significant risks’ says the company and it can give ‘no assurance’, but rather than conducting further studies, it is pressing ahead with Solwara 1 to try and “demonstrate that seafloor resource development is commercially viable and environmentally sustainable”. (p24)

Nautilus warns ‘there is significant risk with this approach and no assurance can be given that the system will successfully demonstrate commercial viability’ .(p52)

Nautilus admits:  

  • It is going ahead with the mine despite ’not having completed and not intending to complete any preliminary economic assessment, pre-feasibility study or feasibility study’ (p52)
  • It does not know if its technology will work in the sub-sea conditions or if it will work with the materials to be mined or even if the different technologies will work together in a single application (p52)
  • “Performance, availability, reliability, maintenance, wear and life of equipment are unknown” (p54)
  • Its approach is ‘to first test the operational viability of the whole production system at Solwara 1 in order to demonstrate if these technologies can cut and recover the minerals’ (p52)

Amazingly, even if the mining equipment does actually work, Nautilus still doesn’t know if there are any commercial quantities of minerals to be recovered. In the Information Form, Nautilus admits it has not even drilled the seabed, the resource ’has only essentially been surface sampled’. Without proper testing by drilling, the published results “should be considered of low [sic] confidence” (p46).

Perhaps even more damning, Nautilus admits it does not know what the actual impacts of the mining operations will be on the environment (p61).

Given these startling and damning admissions, will the Papua New Guinea authorities now step in and stop this giant experiment with people’s lives, livelihoods, culture and environment?

4 Comments

Filed under Environmental impact, Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

4 responses to “Nautilus: ‘Solwara 1 seabed mine is an experiment’

  1. Pingback: Nautilus: ‘Solwara 1 seabed mine is an experiment’ | Deep Sea Mining: Out Of Our Depth

  2. Pingback: Nautilus Minerals facing financial collapse | Papua New Guinea Mine Watch

  3. Pingback: Government to waste more money on Solwara 1 experiment? | Papua New Guinea Mine Watch

  4. David lambu

    Can PNG economically survive without seabed mining in PNG? if yes, then forget about seabed mining in PNG.

    PNG seabeds should not be used for experiential purposes.

    If land mining companies are unable to control pollution of river systems in Bougainville and OK. There is no guarantee at all that seabed mining will be safe for the marine life in the PNG waters. Diversity of marine life and its environs in PNG waters is worth the peoples’ lives than anything else.

    Forget seabed mining in PNG Waters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s