Anglo American divests from Nautilus over risks of deep sea mining

Major mining company withdraws from high risk Solwara 1 deep sea mining project – will Nautilus Minerals go under before reaching the ocean floor?

Deep Sea Mining Campaign | Monday 7 May 2018

In advance of their London AGM on 8th May, Anglo American has exclusively confirmed to the Deep Sea Mining Campaign that they have exited their investment in the Nautilus Minerals Solwara 1 deep sea mining project.

Dr. Helen Rosenbaum, of the Deep Sea Mining Campaign said:

“We are pleased that Anglo American engaged with us and listened to the concerns of coastal and islands communities in Papua New Guinea, whose environment and way of life would be devastated by Nautilus’s proposed Solwara 1 mine.”

Dr. Rosenbaum continued:

“Anglo’s decision to dump their minority stake in this controversial and floundering company was the only option consistent with their international commitments to sustainability, human rights, and environmental stewardship.  Deep sea mining is financially and environmentally risky. The legitimacy of the Solwara 1 project has been questionable right from the outset with independent reviews highlighting significant flaws in the Solwara 1 Environmental Impact Statement.” 

Legal action launched by Papua New Guinean communities will also answer questions about whether the Solwara 1 project was lawfully approved. In the meantime local communities have turned out in force at formal hearings held in PNG’s New Ireland Province to object to the extension of Nautilus exploration licences. 

Anglo’s decision reinforces the growing opposition to deep sea mining. Sir David Attenborough is the latest to add his voice against this hazardous and unnecessary emerging industry, describing the Solwara 1 project as “deeply tragic.”

Andy Whitmore of the Deep Sea Mining Campaign, who will attend the Anglo American AGM noted that:

“In terms of financial and reputational risk, Anglo American have chosen a good time to be exiting. But for Nautilus it looks like it could not have come at a worse time, and may well be the final nail in the coffin for this dangerous experiment.”

“The company continues to limp along with bridging loans from its two long term major shareholders – MB Holdings and Metalloinvest – while continuing to accumulate significant debt with interest payable at 8% per annum.  One wonders how long this can continue and when these shareholders will be forced to pull the plug.”

Nautilus’ recent investor updates reveals it is even unable to raise the finance to complete the Production Support Vessel essential to its operational model.  The investor update notes “there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in securing the necessary additional financing transactions within the required time or at all.”

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Environmental impact, Human rights, Mine construction, Papua New Guinea

3 responses to “Anglo American divests from Nautilus over risks of deep sea mining

  1. Nigel Tribolet

    I am open minded about the Nautilus projects, neither rabidly for nor against.

    I read and generally respect the comment on PNG Mine Watch, however in this case the article is self serving for the anti Nautilus group, and at worst lacks honesty in its reading of the Anglo exit.

    In fact Anglo are undergoing a well publicised rationalisation , dropping non core or insignificant projects from its worldwide portefolio to concentrate on larger and Tier 1 projects.

    At the same time, in the interests os presenting a balanced picture, some progress has in fact been made by Nautilus regarding progress with its Production Support Vessel quite recently.

    I will continue to read and respect your publication, but a fair appraisal of the facts should be presented in all the stories.

    Regards,

    Nigel Tribolet

    ________________________________

  2. Gee Mail

    I’m all for a bit of scientific experimentation and I really don’t think the deep sea mining project is going to be a global killer. What concerns me more are the economics and a country like PNG having to invest scarce resources in a less than proven technology because of the Mining Act says they need to before the grant of a mining lease. Fully agree with Nigel above, Anglo made the right move to divest for the right reasons – it’s not a core asset in their portfolio.

  3. Pingback: Nautilus Minerals Dives to New 12-Month Low at $0.11 | Papua New Guinea Mine Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s