Tag Archives: LNG

Trucking firm stops oil and LNG services over ongoing holdups

The National aka The Loggers Times | October 12, 2017

TRANS Wonderland Limited, one of the major road transport companies in the country, has stood down all its trucks serving the Hides and Kutubu oil and LNG operations through the Komo, Tari, Nipa and Mendi roads yesterday.
Managing director Larry Andagali told The National the road from Mendi to Tari, especially the Wara Lai, Poroma, Tindom Hill and Nipa sections have turned into a “hell hole”.
Sections of the Nogoli-Kobalu road are in similar condition.
“These roads are the key supply routes to support PNG’s oil and LNG production and operations facilities,” Andagali said.
He said the company’s truck drivers were held up at gunpoint and ordered to return to where they were travelling from.
“In some instances our drivers were dragged out of trucks, stripped naked and robbed of their clothes, shoes and money.”
Andagali said the robbers also emptied fuel from rucks.
He said people in authority had disregarded such lawlessness in the resources areas.
“It does not take a rocket scientist to understand that PNG needs oil tax and oil production to continue to support the national budget.”
Andagali said the Government needed LNG taxes which would hit the national budget in 2019 and 2020 after all LNG assets depreciated under the “accelerated depreciation” clause in the gas agreement.
“PNG’s reputation hangs in the balance if the project cannot continue to operate because essential cargo to keep these operations going is delayed and cannot reach them in time.
“Such actions by our people must be condemned in the strongest possible terms and a senior citizen of Hela and Southern Highlands.”

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Papua New Guinea

Papuan landowners in PNG to receive first LNG project royalties of K15m

Boera village in Central province landowners from the PNG LNG Project to receive royalties. Video: EMTV News

Meriba Tulo in Boera village | Asia Pacific Report | September 13, 2017

After more than three years and 200 shipments, landowners of Boera village in Papua New Guinea’s Central province have became the first beneficiaries from the PNG LNG Project to receive royalties.

This followed the release of royalty benefits for PNG LNG Petroleum Processing Facility Licence 2 (PPFL2) area landowners to the Mineral Resources Development Company (MRDC) from the Department of Petroleum and Energy, Department of Finance, and the Central Bank.

Royalty payments for the four villages of Boera, Papa, Porebada and Rearea are in line with the Ministerial Determination number G692, 2015, which will see 83 clans receive a share of K15.6 million (NZ$6.7 million).

According to the Oil and Gas Act 1998, only 40 percent is to be paid as cash disbursement to landowners, with the remaining 60 percent to be set aside in two trusts – the Future Generation Trust Fund (FGTF) and Community Investment Trust Fund (CITF).

Royalty Payment Allocation:
1. Cash Payment to Landowners: K6,250,701.00
2. Community Investment Trust Fund: K4,688,026.00
3. Future Generation Trust Fund: K4,688,026.00

From the K6,250,701.00 cash allocation, this is further broken up according to the following:
1. Rearea Village: K1,746,946.00
2. Papa Village: K1,746,946.00
3. Boera Village: K1,352,027.00
4. Porebada Village: K1,154,755.00
5. Others: K250,028.00

Meriba Tulo is a senior reporter and presenter and currently anchors Resource PNG as well as EMTV’s daily National News. EMTV News items are republished by Asia Pacific Report with permission.

Leave a comment

Filed under Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

K15M For LNG Plant Site Landowners Delayed Again

Melissa Yafoi | Post Courier | September 7, 2017

Highlands landowners from the LNG resource site yesterday stopped the K15 million payment for their coastal counterparts.

And their actions are likely to cause a shutdown at the plant site in Port Moresby as a result.

They insisted no payments be made until their own houses were put in order including the clan vetting process and other outstanding payment commitments made by the O’Neill government over the years were honoured.

They said failure to pay them will result in their shutting down of the project from the upstream end.

Their action is likely to result in the same threat from the coastal provinces who have resolved their outstanding clan ownership issues and only awaiting the first K15 million payment.

The Central landowners were about to be paid the amount having fulfilled all the legal requirements until yesterday when a demand for stop payment was made to the government through the Department of Petroleum and Energy.

The LNG site landowners insistence were despite court actions and disputes and the outstanding clan vetting process on ownership of the land which the project is located delaying their payments.

All monies owed to them are banked in trust accounts including those from Central Province.

In the ransom-like situation newly appointed Petroleum and Energy Minister Fabian Pok was caught off guard lamely saying he was new to the job and needed more time to understand the outstanding issues.

This is despite the Government’s previous hard line stance in paying landowners that resolve their landownership issues ahead of those pending in courts, the mediation process and other resolution arbitration.

Departmental Deputy Secretary Kepsey Puiye and Mineral Resources Development Company Limited external affairs general manager Imbi Tangune also succumbed to the demands saying it was sensitive and payment would not be made to the Central landowners.

Mr Puiye said the K15 million will be paid to the plant site land owners once the minister gives his approval.

He said of the amount 60 per cent will be kept by MRDC as per the Oil and Gas Act under section 176 and only 40 per cent will be paid for immediate investment.

“This is one of the very important projects that will have a profound effect on the economy of the country that is why it is important that the minister needs to appreciate all the issues for the upstream.

“Because the upstream holds the pipeline and that is important so the minister is also very cautious of the implications it will have on the upstream landowners because projects such as this is fundamentally important so he is saying let me look at the issues first.

“The plant site landowners need to appreciate that once the upstream is not alright then we are going to destroy the project,” he said.

Mr Tangune added: “I’m actually very sensitive to the minister’s need to ensure that he understands the issues surrounding payments for the plant site, licence areas and the pipelines so when he is actually comfortable he will give us the timeline for us to make that payment.

“We’ve done everything and the money is with us and we have done everything to pay the money to the land owners.

We ask our landowners to be patient because money is coming, it’s not an issue of its not, it’s an issue of when and I think we have done everything possible to give money to landowners whatever they are entitled to.”

1 Comment

Filed under Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

Sovereign Wealth Fund Is Our Security

Barney Orere | Post Courier | August 22, 2017

Concepts such as Dutch Disease are risks that threaten macroeconomic stability and consequently the long term development of the economy. This requires a forceful and comprehensive response from Government at all levels.

Given the fact that there is heavy dependence on the non-renewable sector; that is, petroleum and minerals, the current generation arguably has clear obligations to ensure that the benefits from their exploitation is available to generations that will come later.

Of importance will be the manner in which the State manages the increase in economic activity and resulting fiscal flows. The implementation of large scale projects such as the PNG LNG in a small economy such as PNG poses considerable challenge in terms of macroeconomic management also.

To minimize the potential negative impact of the considerable increase in financial flows and economic activity on the national economy, the Government policy was to ensure that a Sovereign Wealth Fund structure was implemented in the lead-up to increase in fiscal flows.

A Government submission says that whilst PNG LNG Project forms the backdrop of the implementation of Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) in PNG, it was to be expected that the SWF, upon establishment, was likely to be the recipient of financial flows from a range of projects or sources.

The submission which had its cover page removed was found in a warehouse quite by chance. Although some progress could have been made on the SWF, the lack of conversation has prompted the matter to be brought out into the open and there are insights which, hopefully, will get the conversation going.

The idea behind a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) was to secure PNG’s future by putting away savings from major resource projects. Parliament passed the enabling law and five years later conversation on SWF needs to come out stronger.

Time has become of profound essence because earnings from PNG LNG will be flowing in a less than three years from now and without a SWF in place, where will we put the money?

The country is at a critical crossroad because without a management mechanism in place, the synergy effects of vast earnings in a small economy will be the cocktail for the dreaded Dutch disease.

What is more troubling than ever is the lucrative nature of SWF; the nation’s future security will need to be conducted at the most highest level of integrity and that means transparency and accountability. Hopefully this isn’t one of our greatest obstacles because we mess it up now and there’s nothing for future generations.

On February 22, 2012, Parliament passed the Organic Law on the Sovereign Wealth Fund; a high profile initiative that has the potential to be a significant contributor to the welfare of the people, stability and growth of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea for generations to come.

The statutory objectives of Sovereign Wealth Fund are:-

  • TO support macroeconomic stabilization,
  • TO support the development objectives of the Government, including long-term economic and social development, and,
  • TO support asset management in relation to assets accrued from natural resource revenue.

The SWF was to consist of:-

(a) A Stabilisation Fund, to manage the impact of fluctuation of mineral and petroleum revenues on the economy and on the national budget, and,

(b) A Development Fund, to provide definite and ongoing funding for economic and social development in accordance with the development plans of the Government.

The author/s of the submission noted that the organic Law on Sovereign Wealth Fund creates the following stakeholders to be involved in running the SWF:-

  • SWF Board to oversee the SWF (Section 16 of the Organic Law on SWF)
  • Minister responsible for Treasury matters to determine the investment mandate for the SWF board and receive and consider reports from the board (section 6),
  • SWF Appointment Committee to appoint members of the SWF board (section 22)
  • Independent Probity Auditor to consider probity issues associated with the operation of the SWF (section 39), and ,
  • Secretariat to assist with the operational aspects of the SWF (section 31).

Certain matters regarding the composition, functions and governance of each of these stakeholders are set out in the Organic Law. However, details of how these stakeholders will manage the SWF and interact with each other have not been fully provided for in the Organic Law.

Section 42 of the Organic law provides for regulations to be passed in future which are necessary to give effect to the Organic Law on SWF.

The submission recommended that in advance of the start of revenues being ready for deposit, the National Executive Council should take action to implement the Organic Law on SWF with the view to ensuring that it was fully operational prior to operations starting at the PNG LNG Project. To this end a working committee was suggested to take charge of implementing the Organic Law.

PNG has already made dozens of LNG shipments.

When the Post-Courier raised the dangers of Dutch disease in a feature, Treasury Secretary, Dairy Vele made a statement a day or two later, that tax revenue from the PNG LNG Project would not be seen until 2020 (or thereabouts). He took the trouble of explaining how complicated the project was and made no mention of proceeds from any shares that might be held in the project; only the tax component.

PNG borrowed about K14 billion to get the PNG LNG Project off the ground.

When Prime Minister Peter O’Neill took office after the 2012 General Election, he spoke of starting the Sovereign Wealth Fund but the conversation gradually faded as he got embroiled in the tussle over the Independent Commission Against Corruption and other legal squabbles that confronted him.

The aim of the Organic Law on SWF was the establishment of the appropriate structures for the management of PNG’s increased resource wealth.

We see now from the submission that we’re dealing with a very lucrative organization. But it is the decisions that will be made that will protect the future of PNG.

With the earnings from the PNG LNG coming up, as indicated by the Treasury, work on SWF must begin because there are still some outstanding bits and pieces to attend to. Time is of essence because this is the entry point for Dutch Disease to set in. We will have so much money to throw around we will wreak havoc in our small economy; that is the danger.

Leave a comment

Filed under Corruption, Financial returns, Papua New Guinea

Benefits Delivery From PNG LNG Must Improve

Oil Search Managing Director Peter Botten Has Called For An Improvement On The Disbursement Of Funds Owed To Landowners Of The PNG LNG Project

Post Courier | August 21, 2017

Oil Search managing director Peter Botten has called for an improvement on the disbursement of funds owed to landowners of the PNG LNG project.

The calls are in light of the ongoing debate pertaining to the benefits being derived from the oil and gas business.

Speaking at a business breakfast last week hosted by the Business Council of Papua New Guinea (BCPNG), Mr Botten told business and government leaders including the Prime Minister Peter O’Neill, that he believed there is a broad feeling that the recent developments have delivered little over the last few years.

“Benefits delivery from PNG LNG must improve. Landowners must be paid.

“The money is there, some have already been paid but barriers to revenue distribution must be removed,” he said.

“Over K3billion has been paid by the project in royalties, development levies and equity distributions to the State and landowners since 2014.

“Maybe not as much as some people expected but still it’s a considerable sum,” the managing director said.
Prior to these statements, Mr Botten had told the business and government leaders that with the right environment oil and gas production can more than double over the next five to seven years.

“Potential investment over K60billion in developments, appraisal and exploration are possible in this time frame. Construction can lead to over 20,000 new jobs with significant other spin off economic activities,” he said.

However he stressed there were many issues to resolve to make this happen.

He said a prerequisite to success is developers engaging with government, landowners and indeed the whole country to demonstrate fair value distribution for all parties must be achieved from existing projects.

“One that people feel is right value for resources extracted, one where developers work with state to deliver infrastructure address service delivery and support both economic and social development of the country,” Mr Botten said.

1 Comment

Filed under Financial returns, Papua New Guinea

PNG LNG Willl Not Be Another Bougainville Crisis: Duban

The Mention Of Another Bougainville Civil War , As A Result In The Delay In The Payment Of The PNG LNG Project, As Speculated In The Debates In Australia In The Past Few Days “Is Nonsense And Unwarranted”.

Post Courier | June 14, 2017

The mention of another Bougainville civil war , as a result in the delay in the payment of the PNG LNG project, as speculated in the debates in Australia in the past few days is nonsense and unwarranted.
Petroleum Minister Nixon Duban was responding to questions put to him by the Post-Courier, on Tuesday, pertaining to reports carried in the overseas media on this issue.
While also in light of reports that had surfaced over the weekend of a planned protest by aggrieved landowners from the Central Province.
The protest did not eventuate at the plant site outside of Port Moresby.
However, the issue of royalty payouts to landowners came under the spotlight in Australia when questions were raised, by one of its senators as to why the Australian government through its Export Finance Insurance Corporation (EFIC) had not taken measures to ensure royalty payments were made.
The minister had expressed disappointment that some senior politicians had joined in the chorus inciting fear in the whole debate, reminding them that they were part of the O’Neill government until recently.
He had reiterated that the main reason for the delay of payment in the early payment of landowner benefits, was that many legitimate landowners had not been identified in the project area in Hela.
Mr Duban said PNG LNG project has a lifespan of over 50 years.
He said the landowners were fully aware and would not destroy something that would sustain their livelihood and that of the generation to come.
“Bougainville stemmed out from serious discontentment over what was poorly structured landowner benefits package.”
“PNG LNG landowners are given a much better deal with the foundation LNG project showing significant signs of expansion.
“I believe the growth potential will come with new opportunities and improved better deals for PNG and our landowners,” he said.
He assured investors and stakeholders that the project was in safe hands.

1 Comment

Filed under Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

Spotlight on Australian govt financing role in LNG Project

“So the Australian tax payer’s getting paid and the population of PNG is not”

Radio New Zealand | 13 June, 2017

The Australian government’s Export Finance Insurance Corporation has been questioned in the senate about its role in Papua New Guinea’s LNG Project.

EFIC’s US$350 million loan to the PNG LNG Project was the biggest ever foreign loan made by Australia’s government.

There’s been particular scrutiny applied to EFIC’s response to the non-payment of royalties to LNG Project landowners.

PNG’s LNG Project, lead operated by ExxonMobil, has been successfully shipping annual exports worth billions of dollars since 2014.

However landowners in the project area say they have not been paid royalties promised them under the project’s founding agreement, estimated to total US$300 million.

Western Australia’s Senator Scott Ludlam took EFIC to task over why it had not taken measures to ensure payments were made.

“So I understand that, May 2017, the 300th shipment of LNG left Port Moresby, but the payment of royalties owed to landowners under benefit sharing arrangements hasn’t even begun,” he said.

EFIC’s director of environmental and technical review, Jan Parsons, told the senator royalties were not its responsibility.

“It’s the benefits, the royalties as you say, which only started flowing after LNG gas started being exported.”

“That is the part which is managed by the government, and the project has no role in that, legally or morally, if you like,” he said.

“And my understanding of the problem that’s holding up the distribution of those payments is identifying the actual people who should be receiving the payments.”

Senator Ludlam sensed EFIC was trying to distance itself from its project obligations, by identifying royalties as strictly a government matter.

“It’s easy to say that it’s not a project matter. But landholders have been dispossessed. They’ve been told that they’d be paid out.”

“There’s an amount of benefits which I understand is in the range of 400 million Australian dollars which hasn’t actually hit the ground. And this thing is busy exporting PNG LNG over the horizon.”

According to PNG’s Treasurer for the past three years, Patrick Pruaitch, the identification process Mr Parsons referred to, or clan vetting, should have been completed well before the first LNG shipment left PNG’s shores.

Mr Pruaitch admitted the Peter O’Neill-led government, of which he had been a key member until recent weeks, had failed to resolve this issue.

Jan Parsons would only offer that the Project was trying to help the government in identifying the landowners who should receive the royalties

“And in speeding up the payments, because it’s in the Project’s interests. But that’s something the project is doing, not as a legal matter, but being a good neighbour, if you like.”

Senator Ludlum mentioned reports of an arms build-up and escalating tensions among landowners in the region where LNG Project’s well heads are based, the Highlands province of Hela.

“When does the Commonwealth start to get its money back?

EFIC”s chief credit officer John Pacey stepped in to answer the question

“Repayments have already commenced.”

“So the Australian tax payer’s getting paid and the population of PNG is not. That seems a little peverse,” Mr Pacey said. 

“What are the risks to Australia being repaid if we end up with another Bougainville on our hands through civil unrest, armed or otherwise, in the impact area where people are likely pretty pissed off that they’re 400 million dollars short of the royalties that they’re owed?”

Export Finance Insurance Corporation wouldn’t be drawn on impacts of a “hypothetical” situation, telling the senator it had evaluated risks of the project, but not specifically about the potential for armed conflict in relation to the project.

Leave a comment

Filed under Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea