Tag Archives: Raymond Masono

LOs Welcome Bid To Discuss Panguna

Panguna mine in operation, circa 1971 (Photo: Robert Owen Winkler/Wikimedia Commons)

Post Courier | July 22, 2019

The Special Mining Lease Osikaiyang Landowners Association (SMLOLA) has welcomed the Bougainville Mining Minister Raymond Masono’s statement that the ABG is prepared to discuss Panguna and find a resolution.

“Reconciliation is vital at this critical time,” said SMLOLA chair Philip Miriori.

“If the minister is genuine and I believe he is, this is the first positive step forward towards reconciliation after many years of trying to have a meeting.

“We are committed to working with the ABG and really appreciate the Minister’s invitation.”

He said the ABG does not appear to have a full understanding of the Panguna landowners proposal and believe that this meeting will be the first step in clarifying any misunderstanding.

Mr Miriori said: “The Panguna landowners are offering to transfer to the ABG and all the people of Bougainville, 100 per cent of Panguna.

“Secondly, the landowners proposal is for the ABG to issue the Panguna License to this 100 per cent ABG owned entity and operate the mine, in a fair, world’s best, corporate partnership.

“It’s important that any ABG- Panguna proposal has landowner support as if there is one thing the history of Panguna screams loudest, it is the critical need for landowner support and harmony,” Mr Miriori said.

“Again, we look forward to meaningful and fruitful dialogue with our Mining Minister and ABG as soon as possible. We are here to help and work co-operatively with the ABG – we just need genuine and open dialogue.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Bougainville, Human rights

Caballus Deal Is ‘Smoke And Mirrors’

Jeff McGlinn of Caballus Mining giving a presentation in Bougainville

Post Courier | June 11, 2019

The McGlinn Caballus presentation to the Autonomous Bougainville Government totally contradicts the Bougainville Mining Minister’s recent statement that appeared in the Post-Courier (May 7, 2019) that Bougainville Advance Mining Limited, is not McGlinn’s Caballus.

The original draft bills introduced to the House of Representatives and sponsored by the Bougainville Mining Minister Raymond Masono, specifically referred to Bougainville Advance Mining Limited.

Searches of the Registry of Corporate Affairs in the British Virgin Islands confirms that the Bougainville Advance Mining Limited was approved for incorporation on August 8, 2018, and the Certificate of Incorporation was issued and dated August 9, 2018.

The incorporation certificate confirms the BVI Company Number for Bougainville Advance Mining is 1988673.  The directors and shareholders were not disclosed.

The off shore company is incorporated by Intershore Consult (BVI) Ltd.

Their web site interestingly states that Intershore is a wealth management firm specialising in tax planning, virtual offices and nominee services, among other things.

Philip Miriori, the chairman of the Panguna Landowners Association – the Special Mining Lease Osikaiyang Landowners Association (SMLOLA) asked the question, as to why is the Mining Minister Masono now trying to hide the fact that Caballus is behind Bougainville Advance Mining Limited?

“Everyone knows this is a McGlinn incorporated shelf company and the Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) has undertaken to give McGlinn 40 per cent in this entity and Panguna for free.

“The ABG has told everyone including our ABG MPs for months this.

“While the BEC – Special Meeting No.2 of 2019, Decision No.3 of 2019, dated January 28, 2019, confirms the BEC formally endorsed the assent of the bills and the issuance of a Special Bougainville Mining License to Bougainville Advance Mining Limited in respect of the whole of Bougainville.

“Similarly, the Bougainville Executive Council special meeting No. 1 of 2019 dated January 24, 2019, recorded the formal approval of Bougainville Advance Mining Ltd (BAM) for the purpose of carrying out all mining activities in Bougainville, approved the establishment of BAM.”

SMLOLA advisor Lawrence Daveona also chimed in to say that it is totally unacceptable to be trying to steal Panguna from the customary owners.

And further transfer Panguna to this highly secretive off shore BVI entity. “This Caballus deal is smoke and mirrors.” he added

Leave a comment

Filed under Bougainville, Financial returns, Human rights

Bougainville Mining Act Changes Strongly Opposed By LOs

Post Courier | June 7, 2019

The chairman of the Special Mining Lease Osikaiyang Landowners Association (SMLOLA) has refuted claims by ABG vice-president Raymond Masono that he made on Radio NZ yesterday.

SMLOLA chairman Philip Miriori in a statement said: “The truth is… there is overwhelming opposition throughout Bougainville to the purported demanded changes to the Bougainville Mining Act.

“We have all signed a resolution confirming our strong opposition to these offensive changes to the law that seeks to strip us o our rights, without any fair real compensation whatsoever.

“Everyone understands the Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) cannot afford to pay us a fair or a just compensation.”

SMLOLA special adviser Lawrence Daveona said this is an attack on all landowners in Bougainville.

“Why do they want to disrespect us and treat us so badly once again.

“It will be torn down by the Courts if rammed through the House of Representatives,” Mr Daveona said.

He said independent legal advice to the SMLOLA also confirms the Mining Act changes breaches no fewer than 10 separate sections of the Bougainville and PNG constitutions including:

  • S53 and s293 of the National Constitution; and
  • S23 (1), s44 (1) (b), s66(4), s178, s181, s180 (2) and s180 (3) of the Bougainville Constitution.

And based on legal advice, Mr Miriori said they believe the people are being misled when they (Mr Masono) say that the Mining Act changes will ensure landowners retain control of the minerals once they are extracted and give landowners greater control.

He challenged Mr Masono to provide the ABG’s independent legal advice. “Our advice tells us that the effect of the changes is to remove customary ownership of minerals and remove landowners veto rights.”

He said landowners do not even get one share, as all shares are held in a Trust and controlled and owned by the ABG. “Even the Pope has said that indigenous people must have the final say about their land.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Bougainville, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

Mining Subject To B’ville Govt

Panguna mine in operation, circa 1971 (Photo: Robert Owen Winkler/Wikimedia Commons)

Post Courier | May 7, 2019

All mining, oil, and gas powers and functions belong to the Autonomous Bougainville Government, says ABG vice president and mining minister Raymond Masono.

Mr Masono said this in response to a news article titled “Bougainville admonished by O’Neill over planned mining change” which was posted on social media through Radio New Zealand on Monday, April 29.

The ABG mining minister said the the transfer of these powers from the national government to the ABG was signed in March 2008 at Alotau between the late president, Joseph Kabui, and the then deputy prime minister, Sir Puka Temu.

“This process was in turn completed when the ABG passed its own mining law in April, 2015,” Mr Masono said.

“The ABG mining act is unique in the sense that it recognises landowners as owners of the minerals beneath the ground and not the crown or the state as in Papua New Guinea.

“The proposed amendment further consolidates this ownership rights by giving landowners and the ABG controlling interest in any major mining development project, starting with the Panguna mine through a Bougainvillean mining entity that would own 60 per cent of the shares on behalf of the landowners, ABG and the people of Bougainville.

“The Bougainville entity is not Caballus, it is the Bougainville advance mining company,” he said

Mr Masono said contrary to the Rio Tinto Group-aligned special mining lease Osikaiyang landowners association (SMOLA) that the amendments take away landowner rights, the proposed amendments give landowners more and better benefits in terms of equity and royalties than they are currently entitled to under the existing law.

“But the Panguna mine no longer belongs only to the RTG sponsored SMOLA, rather the mine belongs also to the other eight mine-affected landowners, whose land was used for mining purposes in the 17 years of operations and who support the amendment,” he said.

“It also belongs to all Bougainvilleans because the blood of 20,000 lives was spilled over the mine by Bougainvilleans, who died fighting to protect these resources.”

He said Bougainvilleans have consented that the Panguna mine must reopen, but not with Bougainville Copper Ltd and certainly not with RTG, two firms that are no doubt sponsoring those opposed the amendments. Mr Masono said relevant agencies have conducted and continued to carry out awareness to correct the misinformation, deliberate misinterpretation that are being propagated by those opposed to the proposed amendments.

The ABG is not rushing its work, it will continue to consult with landowners and the people of Bougainville before it passes the amendments.

“In addition to these consultations, the people of Panguna are now engaged in their own traditional social mapping process called ‘tangurang’ to identify the true landowners,” he said.

Leave a comment

Filed under Mine construction, Papua New Guinea

MASONO DEFENDS A DRACONIAN EDICT

Bougainville Indigenous Rights Advocate | 3 May, 2019

The article in the Post Courier, “Masono defends Bougainville Mining Amendment” dated 30/04/19, shows that Jeffrey McGlinn has certainly struck some deep chord in the heart of the cream of ABG politicians and bureaucrats a comprising of the President Dr. John Momis, Vice President Masono himself, Finance Minister Robin Wilson and the Mining Department Secretary, Cedric Himata.

In the article, Vice President open’s his “Che Guevaraic” delivery with the profound word “revolution”. What a choice of word to cloak the assault on the human rights of the landowners, to serve the interest of a foreigner who has dazzled the El Presidente’s gullible inner circle with a ridiculous promise of 60 percent share equity in a dubious Bougainville mining company, which obviously is already registered in the British Virgin Islands.

It is disheartening to see Vice President defending amendments that were written outside Bougainville by McGlinn’s lawyers obviously after going through the Bougainville Constitution and the Bougainville Mining Act 2015 (BMA 2015) with a fined tooth comb, hoping to find irregularities on which to base their absurd justification to amend a law that protects customary rights of landowners.

If the ABG is trying to use a flaw in the BMA 2015, conjured up overseas by foreign lawyers, to take control of ownership of the resources then landowners will be losers all over and again. In reality, Jeffrey McGlinn is trying to gain monopoly by duping the ABG with offer of fairy-tale 60 percent share equity which will decrease in value due to it’s incapability to raise funds. The consequence is such that the dilution of the shares in inevitable.

In the article Vice President Masono is quoted as saying:

“It is time now that we take the bull by the horn.

“We’ve been made to believe that only the white man and foreign companies can do mining for us.

I find this somewhat disturbing, because ABG after all has struck a deal with a “green man” Jeffrey McGlinn who mislead ABG about his companies extensive experiences in mining when “Caballus” was only founded recently.\

If the Vice President doesn’t already know, “Caballus” is poetic latin word for horse. That is what Jeffrey McGlinn is. A failed “white as snow” horse breeder.

Lastly, Vice President Masono’s revolution is debauchery and contravenes section 23 (1) which provides “The laws and policies of Bougainville shall be directed towards the recognition of customary rights of the people of Bougainville in relation the land and the sea, and natural, mineral and oil resources of Bougainville and any law relating to the development of such resources shall take that into account.”

Notice that the section says “Customary” Rights of the people. Landownership is customary in Bougainville and the BMA2015 specifies that.

This is ownership is further reinforced by Section 53 of the national Constitution of Papua New Guinea which talks about the protection from unjust deprivation of property. This is the very protection that is under threat from the ABG’s proposed amendment to BMA 2015.

Leave a comment

Filed under Bougainville, Corruption, Financial returns, Human rights

Bougainville Mining Act Rejected

Post Courier | February 11, 2019

THE proposed Amendment of the Bougainville Mining Act (BMA) was rejected outright.

It was rejected by the Panguna Landowners, Ex-Combatants, No Mining Groups, Core Team, the eight Association Chairmen of the Mining Affected Areas including the Special Mining Lease Osikaiyang Landowner Association (SMLOLA) members and the general public in Arawa who were present at the first attempt to consult on the new Bills – the ABG Consultation with the Panguna Mine Affected Landowners’ meeting, held at the Arawa Youth Centre yesterday.

SMLOLA chairman Martin Miriori said: “There were no answers that could explain or rationalise the attempt to steal our minerals and deny us all our rights under the BMA.

“The Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) Bougainville Executive Council (BEC) presentation was done by the instigators of the plan, ABG Finance and Treasury Minister, Mr Robin Wilson and the Mining Department, headed by the Mining Minister Mr Raymond Masono.

“Why is that, the Bills have been referred to the Legislative Review Committee as it is supposed to be subjected to independent reviews and consultations but there is nothing independent here.”

“They now seem to be trying to go even further, making it very clear that landowners will not have any interest in the mining company.

“The Government will be entitled to hold all the shares, something like Kumul Holdings or MRDC.

“But our law was very carefully drafted to be different to reflect the particular needs and history of Bougainville and its landowners.” Mr Miriori added.

During the presentation, Mr Wilson acknowledged that the SMLOLA’s proposal to the ABG is good but said the Government needs to create this entity through the amendment of the BMA to cater for money going into Government.

In response, Mr Miriori said this makes no sense, the SMLOLA proposal allows the Government to set up a new company and negotiate the deal terms, providing funding directly for the ABG and immediate funding for the Referendum in advance of finalsing documentation.

“There is absolutely no need to push this offensive legislation as the ABG is already being offered a priority position, better than the landowners.”

Mr Miriori further challenged the BEC to demonstrate why landowners should support their plans when it denies them every right that was fundamental to the Peace Agreement, the Constitution and their very autonomy.

“Being told we will give up all their rights with no say and not even one kina of compensation, just a vague promise in the future of something in “one form or another” as the Bill actually says.

“They are suggesting we should just take whatever we are given.

Given the BEC was not able to provide any answers to these very important questions, a resolution by the SMLOLA and Panguna Mine Affected Landowner Associations was then presented to the ABG by Mr Miriori clearly stating the proposed Bills are unfair, unreasonable, unconscionable and unconstitutional.

“If passed they will be challenged and Panguna is delayed indefinitely. “Nobody wins – in fact we all lose.” Mr Miriori added.

1 Comment

Filed under Bougainville, Human rights, Papua New Guinea

TRICK OR TREAT? The attempt by Jeffery McGlinn and Caballus Mining to hijack mining prospects in Bougainville

The abandoned Panguna mine

Chris Baria | February 10, 2019 

Today the people of Arawa, landowners, women, ex-combatant core group, and“no mining” Bougainville hardliners milled into the Sharps Memorial Youth Centre, Arawa, to be“educated” by the Bougainville Executive Council (BEC) on the finer points of mining and controversial amendments to the once controversial Bougainville Mining Act 2015 (BMA) that is yet to be industry tested.

One wonders why such an entourage as BEC has found it necessary to carry out “consultations” on such unpopular bills which have drawn stiff opposition throughout wider sections of the community.

Today, the Finance Minister Robin Wilson and the Vice President and Mining Minister, Raymond Masono spoke out against what they called misinformation and misconceptions in social media that were causing so much confusion about the new mining bills, and the bill to effect amendments to the existing BMA 2015. They said that the amendment to the BMA 2015 were necessary to give more benefits to the resource owners than what the current mining act can provide them.

Their attempt to illustrate the benefits of tampering with the BMA, via PowerPoint presentation, did very little to allay our fears as we were already aware of the sections in the BMA 2015 that were subject to draft amendment by lawyers acting on behalf of Jeffery McGlinn and Caballus Mining. Not only is our law subject to tampering by foreign elements but our ‘mama’ law, the constitution, is affected.

We the people who are preparing to vote on a referendum express our desire to be an independent nation feel violated.

Recently, ABG linked up with a little known mining company that was only registered not long ago in the British Virgin Islands. It appears that“Caballus” mining is owned by Jeffery McGlinn from Perth in Western Australia.

This man McGlinn, whom we know very little about apart contradictory tales of his recently registered company’s experience in working with indigenous people and traditional leaders, has sold a scam to ABG and ABG has swallowed it hook line and sinker. In a very simplistic proposal that omitted the complexities of a mining venture and the “dog-eat-dog” world of business enterprise, Jeffery McGlinn has shaken the house and dazzled it’s gullible occupants. His top card is a fantastic shareholding cut between him and his creation, BAM [Bougainville Advance Mining] that puts Noah Musingku and U-Vistract to shame. “BAM” in Tokpisin means head on collision. As a matter of fact it may well be on collision course with our sanity.

Back at the Youth Centre I was yearning for some excitement to lightened up the dull boring discussions when Hon. Robin Wilson’s man stoked up the projector to show us the workings of BAM.

He continued to tell us how the landowner would get more than what the currently Bougainville Mining Act 2015 provided for and how wonderful it is for Bougainville to have it’s own mining company. He spilled the the secrets of how BAM was going to create an economic miracle for Bougainville and give it a mining company and not rely on foreign companies and white people to come take what rightfully belongs to us.

The decision to butcher the Bougainville Mining Act was conceived by Jeffery McGlinn for the Dodos in ABG and it’s Administration under the pretext of “better benefits” for landowners. The Mining Act is not about better benefits. It should be about the protection of the human rights of the indigenous people of Bougainville which are not interchangeable with monetary benefits.

My question is how much of what was presented in PowerPoint can we say is from within us and our vision? On the one Hon. Wilson tells us not to woo white folk and then on the other hand he presents an idea, not of his own creation but what a smooth talking white dude gave him and the words he breath into good member’s mouth. The idea of Bougainville’s own Mining company and it’s ability to serve the government and it’s people seem quite attractive but what is the price tag on it?

How naïve can our leaders to keep collecting prefabricated nonsense? Despite many of them being educated they still cannot differentiate between what is real and what is fantasy, simply because they don’t bother to check on who they are dealing with in the first place.

This brings up another issue, the capacity of the Autonomous Bougainville Government or any other Bougainville government established to replace it after referendum, and the capability of it’s administration to manage and regulate the impact of a large scale mining operation in the region. Since its inception the Autonomous Bougainville Government has establish a string of businesses and partnerships with the Chinese that leaves us wondering as to how these companies are faring as ABG’s money spinners.

The biggest horror story in this issue is the taking away of landowners rights and privileges and put them under a trust company that is to be controlled by ABG under a section of the BMA. The ABG has not right whatsoever to tamper with landowners’ inalienable rights. When governments become corrupt and tyrannical the “trust” between landowners and government embodied in the trust company is endangered. We see this kind of arrangement which is similar to PNG Sustainable Fund in which landowner monies are either locked in or stolen by politicians already but whatever the reason landowners have no access to their funds.

1 Comment

Filed under Bougainville, Financial returns, Human rights, Papua New Guinea