Post Courier | June 25 2018
Former employees of Summit Development Limited (SDL) are calling on the company to settle their outstanding payments.
Kenneth Cornelius, a former employee representing those affected, said they were laid off in 2014 when the company’s license was cancelled and were eventually terminated without proper settlement. The prolonged delay in settling the outstanding debts due to license refusal and lengthy court processes had extremely affected their families and beneficiaries.
“We, the representatives of former national hire employees, contractors and consultants of Summit Development, a subsidiary of Indochine Mining Limited (IDC) in Australia, have been very silent and patient for more than three years when Summit Development Ltd pursued its license renewal and their judicial review court case in relation to the cancellation of their exploration license 1093,” Mr Cornelius said.
“Without even settling our outstanding debts, our employment contracts with SDL were unmercifully terminated on March 2016. Upon issuing our termination notices, we were only assured by the company management that our outstanding debts and bills will be settled in full once the exploration license EL 1093 is renewed.
“As members of the Mt Kare Project technical team, we have successfully delivered very important achievements for the project, especially the land investigation study, land investigation report, customary land surveys, pre-feasibility studies and land mediation,” Mr Cornelius said.
He said the exploration license renewal was not a condition of their employment contracts with SDL and should not be given as an excuse for not settling them. Around 120 employees, consultants and services providers are affected.
“The National Court Judge Leka Nablu had handed down her final judgment ruling in favour of the former mining minister and State on April 27, 2018, which is not to renew SDL license. Thus we strongly demand that Indochine mining company management voluntarily settle us before they can pursue their judicial review appeal at the Supreme Court,” he said.